← Table of Contents · Page 751 of 868
ETHICS AND SOCIETAL IMPACT
Part 12 of 13
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ASSISTANT PROMPTS
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own material before use.
[START OF PROMPT]
Review this agent's user-facing capability description and flag any overstated or misleading claim about what it actually does: [PASTE LAB OR PRODUCT DESCRIPTION/MARKETING TEXT HERE], actual behavior = [PASTE ACTUAL SYSTEM BEHAVIOR/LIMITATIONS HERE]. Output format: a findings table (Claim, Overstated? Y/N, Corrected Wording).
[END OF PROMPT]
[START OF PROMPT]
We suspect human reviewers of this agent's output are rubber-stamping without real scrutiny because it has been correct so often: [DESCRIBE EVIDENCE, e.g. review time trends, or a sampled review log]. Propose two concrete, practical safeguards against this complacency risk that we could implement in our review process. Output format: a two-item safeguard list, each with an implementation detail and how we would measure whether it is working.
[END OF PROMPT]
CHAPTER SUMMARY
Ethical engineering means describing your system honestly, telling users when they face automation, using resources wisely, and guarding against both runaway autonomy and human over-reliance.
Each of these is a concrete design choice, from wording a product description to adding a known-flawed test item for reviewers.
Advertisement
Read Aloud:
0:00 / 0:00